Minnesota Governor In Negotiations To Let Tribes License Off-Reservation Marijuana Businesses

“I think Minnesota will look different than a lot of states in terms of the role tribal nations will play in our market.”

By Peter Callaghan, MinnPost

Pending compacts between Gov. Tim Walz (DFL) and 10 of the state’s 11 tribal nations would permit tribal governments to license companies to turn into important gamers within the hashish market with off-reservation shops, cultivation and manufacturing.

The compact negotiations, directed by the 2023 legislation that legalized leisure hashish in Minnesota, may give a big share of the brand new business to tribal nations and companies they license. These enterprises can be exempt from guidelines towards vertical integration going through non-tribal companies that forestall them from having retail, cultivation and manufacturing underneath one firm.

The closed-door compact talks were first reported by MinnPost final May. MinnPost obtained a replica of the pending compact language on Tuesday, and the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) acknowledged the general goal of the negotiations.

Spokesperson Josh Collins mentioned in an announcement that the brand new legislation envisioned “a robust, diverse marketplace with room for social equity applicants, Tribal businesses, and general applicants.”

“As we near the execution of the first few compacts, we are also quickly approaching the anticipated adoption of rules, which would make it possible for OCM to begin issuing licenses to the 200 social equity applicants that qualified during the license preapproval round–including 193 microbusinesses that could be in position to open storefronts this spring as well,” the assertion mentioned.

During a listening to earlier than the House Commerce Committee Tuesday, nonetheless, performing OCM director Eric Taubel acknowledged the continued talks when requested concerning the operations already arrange by the Prairie Island Indian Community.

“I can’t go into specifics of the compacts but I think Minnesota will look different than a lot of states in terms of the role tribal nations will play in our market,” Taubel mentioned. “Having partners like Prairie Island who are engaged in this work will help make us a more robust and successful market.”

At the identical listening to, in response to complaints by another lawmakers that the state’s market rollout trails different states, 2023 legislation writer Rep. Zack Stephenson talked about tribal involvement as one of many objectives of the legislation.

“We wanted to prioritize small over large; we wanted to prioritize Minnesota entities over people from other states,” mentioned the Coon Rapids DFLer. “If you end up with a model that gives a big advantage to tribal nations and microbusinesses, that pretty much fits right into what we were trying to do in the beginning.”

Tribes concerned within the talks didn’t but reply to a request for remark.

Leili Fatehi, a lawyer, lobbyist and legalization advocate who helped write the brand new legislation, didn’t remark immediately on the draft compact language however mentioned the gradual rollout of the legalized market—particularly for social fairness candidates—is a much bigger drawback.

“If the licensing process were on track as promised, I don’t think we would be having this conversation, because Tribes and social equity applicants alike would be building their businesses and the early industry infrastructure at the same time,” she mentioned.

“Instead, OCM’s failures have created a situation where Tribal Enterprises are advancing while state license applicants are stuck waiting. That’s not the Tribes’ fault and, unfortunately, now the question has become one of whether the Tribes “deserve” their market share reasonably than whether or not the state’s failure to maneuver licensing ahead is liable for this imbalance.

“Let me be clear: The problem isn’t that Tribes are moving forward—it’s that OCM is falling behind,” Fatehi mentioned.

The particulars of the pending compact come because the state continues to battle litigation to return to a schedule that might see the non-tribal market begin by summer season or fall. A lottery that might have begun issuing provisional licenses to social fairness candidates was canceled when some candidates who weren’t allowed within the lottery sued. Now, the OCM is making ready to simply accept each normal and social fairness license functions later this month with hopes of holding a license lottery in May or June.

That lottery will difficulty 75 retail licenses to social fairness candidates—these from communities that suffered from hashish prohibition—and 75 retail licenses for normal candidates. It may also difficulty 50 cultivator licenses, break up evenly between social fairness and normal candidates. In addition, there might be 50 mezzolicenses in every group. Mezzo licensees are allowed to domesticate and promote in smaller portions than cultivators.

It is troublesome to evaluate what number of retail shops might be tribal affiliated, since every tribe can license a number of “tribal enterprises” that might every have as much as 5 shops and every have as much as 30,000 sq. ft of plant cover. That is the quantity of hashish cultivation that every holder of a non-tribal cultivation license can be permitted.

If every of the ten tribes authorizes one tribal enterprise, that might embody as much as 50 off-reservation dispensaries. If a number of authorizes a couple of tribal enterprise, every may add 5 shops to their stock. The provision would additionally assist smaller tribes or these with reservations in rural components of the state with out giant markets as a result of they might open shops within the metro space.

But not all tribes have been attempting to enter the market, so it’s unknown what number of will signal compacts or begin hashish companies.

The tribal enterprises accredited underneath the compacts must have no less than 51 % tribal possession and can be prevented from working on-reservation and competing with hashish retailers owned by tribal governments. The hashish features of those enterprises can be regulated not by the state Office of Cannabis Management however by tribal regulatory businesses created by tribal governments.

It additionally would permit the ten tribes concerned in negotiations (the one tribe not participating is the Upper Sioux Community) to do enterprise with different tribes and with non-tribal companies licensed by OCM. That means hashish merchandise grown and manufactured by a tribal entity or tribal enterprise might be bought to non-tribal retail shops, micro companies or mezzo companies.

That mentioned, the compacts make a number of references to agreements that lots of the limits and different controls would match these adopted by OCM. And it contains this language: “Tribal Enterprises operating outside of Tribally Regulated Land are not by this Compact made exempt from any generally applicable non-Cannabis related State law or regulation.”

No state taxes will be collected on gross sales on reservation, simply as tribal casinos can’t be made to share income with the state and don’t in Minnesota. But the draft compacts do envision some tax assortment in tribal shops working off reservation.

“The Tribe and State agree that a tax agreement, as authorized under Cannabis Act Art. 2, Sec. 2, subd. 6 for sharing of sales and gross receipts tax collected from any Tribally owned cannabis business that operates off-Reservation, may be negotiated between the Tribe and the Minnesota Department of Revenue in the future,” it states.

While it’s unclear how shut the draft obtained by MinnPost is to a closing settlement, these concerned have been saying they anticipated to shut a deal inside weeks. The White Earth Band of Chippewa announced last week that it might be opening off-reservation shops in Moorhead subsequent month and St. Cloud within the spring, pending approval of a state compact.

When the talks started final spring, the state was represented by employees from the Office of the Attorney General, the Office of Cannabis Management, the governor’s workplace and out of doors authorized counsel Mark Levitan, employed to assist with the negotiations. The state has not engaged in negotiations for brand new compacts with tribes for many years and needed outdoors authorized experience on hashish legislation and tribal relations, which Levitan has, the officers mentioned.

Last May, a Walz administration official talking provided that they not be named, mentioned “these are friendly parties with the goal of getting to yes and making sure the state’s needs and the tribes’ needs are both met by what the statute allows.”

The 2023 legislation that required Walz to barter compacts “in good faith” patterns the talks over the state–tribal compacts over on line casino playing that resulted from the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

“The legislature finds that these agreements will facilitate and promote a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship between the state and the Tribes regarding the legalization of cannabis,” the law states. “Such cooperative agreements will enhance public health and safety, ensure a lawful and well-regulated cannabis market, encourage economic development, and provide fiscal benefits to both Indian Tribes and the state.”

The legislation states that the governor can not require any income sharing or proper to tax tribally licensed hashish gross sales, can not require state licensing or oversight and can’t require tribes to allow state legal guidelines to be enforced on tribally regulated land. It additionally, at some size, assured that enterprise interactions between tribal entities and state-regulated companies—in addition to interactions between non-tribal clients and tribal companies—can be authorized.

This story was first published by MinnPost.

Minnesota Medical Marijuana Program Helps Relieve Pain While Reducing Use Of Opioids And Other Drugs, State Government Study Shows